The U.S. government is proposing to change the H-1B visa program, specifically targeting the lottery system.1 The main reason for this proposed change is to move away from a random lottery and towards a system that favors “high-skilled, high-paid” foreign workers.2
Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons and the proposed replacement:
Why the U.S. wants to scrap the H-1B lottery:
- To Prioritize High-Skilled Workers: The current lottery is random, meaning a recent graduate with an entry-level salary has the same chance of being selected as a highly experienced professional with a senior-level salary. The new system is designed to give a greater chance to workers who have higher skills and are offered higher wages.3
- To Curb Perceived Misuse of the System: The government believes some companies use the lottery to hire lower-paid foreign workers, which critics say undercuts wages for American workers.4 By prioritizing higher-paying jobs, they aim to ensure the program is used for top-tier talent that is not readily available in the U.S. workforce.
- To Address “Gaming” the System: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of registrations for the lottery, with some companies submitting multiple entries for the same person.5 The new rules are intended to prevent this kind of “gaming” and make the system fairer.
What the U.S. wants to use to replace it:
The U.S. is proposing a wage-based, weighted selection process.6
Here’s how it would work:
- Wage Tiers: The system would assign each H-1B candidate to one of four wage tiers (Level 1 to Level 4) based on the salary offered for their specific job and location, using data from the U.S. Department of Labor.7
- Weighted Lottery: Instead of a purely random lottery, the new system would give applicants in higher wage tiers more entries in the selection pool.8 For example:
- A candidate with a Level 4 (highest) wage would get multiple entries (e.g., four).9
- A candidate with a Level 1 (lowest) wage would get only one entry.
- Fairness and Competition: The idea is that while everyone would still have a chance, those with higher-paying job offers would have a significantly better chance of being selected.10 This is meant to encourage employers to offer better compensation and seek out more experienced, qualified candidates.11
It’s important to note that these changes are currently just a proposal and are expected to face legal challenges.12