Daniel Bwala, the Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Policy Communication, has made a notable statement regarding the political future of the president’s son, Seyi Tinubu. In a recent interview on “The Clarity Zone” podcast, Bwala stated that Seyi Tinubu has the constitutional right to contest for any political office in Nigeria, including the presidency, and could even challenge his father in a future election.
Bwala’s comments came in response to the public debate and criticism surrounding Seyi Tinubu’s increasing political visibility and involvement in his father’s administration. Critics have often argued that Seyi’s political relevance is solely due to his father’s influence, but Bwala has dismissed this notion.
Key points from Bwala’s statement:
- Constitutional Right: Bwala emphasized that Seyi Tinubu, as a Nigerian citizen, is legally and constitutionally qualified to run for office, including the governorship of Lagos State or the presidency.
- Separation of Politics and Personal Ties: Bwala highlighted Seyi’s ability to maintain relationships across political divides, even with those who have criticized his father’s administration. He mentioned that he himself has openly criticized the government in the past without it affecting his personal relationship with Seyi.
- Bridge-builder among youth: Bwala described Seyi as a “bridge-builder” among Nigerian youths, noting that he has helped many young people, including those from opposition parties like the “Obidients,” secure opportunities in government.
- Lack of Controversy: Bwala pointed out that unlike some children of past leaders, Seyi Tinubu has not been associated with scandals or public controversies, and maintains a humble and unassuming demeanor.
This statement by a presidential aide adds a new dimension to the discussion about Seyi Tinubu’s political ambitions. While Seyi has been visibly involved in his father’s political campaigns and presidential activities, his direct political aspirations have not been officially announced. Bwala’s remarks suggest a belief in Seyi’s personal political capabilities beyond his family name and position.
